Pachinko & Gender

I think that gender has played a major role in the novel, Pachinko, thus far. I say this because of the insights we see into male and female relationships, considering the majority of the novel has been told by a woman's perspective. It is also important to note that the author, Min Jin Lee, is a woman. The first time I feel like I picked up on gender commentary was when Hansu and Sunja's relationship was evolving and unfolding. The extreme age gap between Hansu and Sunja emphasized the time period to me, since this age gap would be frowned upon in modern times. This relationship played into traditional male/female power dynamics when Hansu was given free-rein of his life, able to leave his wife and children back at home to pursue other opportunities and women. Meanwhile, Sunja was expected to satisfy his desires for sexual and romantic pleasure. After learning Sunja was pregnant, Hansu attempted to control her and keep her for himself by offering money, a home, and support from himself. Sunja declined, yet continued her path directly into the arms of another man - Isak.

In our previous readings, Yoseb was banning Kyunghee from working. In the novel, Kyunghee tells Sunja how Yoseb simply wanted a wife who didn't work and would be ready with a hot dinner when he returned home everyday. He would stop her from pursuing her passions and supporting the family solely to ensure their family followed traditional gender norms. However, Kyunghee justifies these constraints and controlling behavior with the justification that Yoseb financially supports her.

All of this considered, I think that Lee's commentary about gender makes remarks on the constraints women faced, but also the reasonings they told themselves to justify staying in controlling relationships. The reality is that women were controlled by men, and Pachinko is displaying this through the experiences of women in the 20th century.

Comments

  1. Hey Audrey! I agree that Lee does a great job of showing how for these women, the 'choice' to stay in a controlling relationship is often not even a real choice at all. Torn between a lack of control and ruin, it is no wonder that Sunja and Kyunghee have to submit to the men with power over them. However, it makes their small victories such as leaving Hansu or convincing Yoseb to let them work even more admirable when you realize the dynamics they have to overcome.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Audrey! I really liked this post. I like how you included the part about Sunja almost immediately being forced to turn to Isak after Hansu. Even though Isak is a much more morally strong character than Hansu, he still shows some of the typical gender roles and capitalizes on his masculinity. He is able to take Sunja as her bride, and is seen as a savior for it. While, in the context, yes it was a very beneficial option for Sunja, looking at it from a bigger perspective, it is sometimes shocking to think about how taking this girl who have never met and making her your bride/dependent is something "noble."

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree, Audrey. The agency of a lot of the female characters in the novel is stripped and there is often no choice but to conform to gender norms to survive. Hansu and Sunja's relationship is evidence of this. However, I do not know if I would call Yoseb controlling. Sure, he doesn't want his wife to work, but I don't think its out of manipulation or toxicity. He is also a victim of hyper-masculinity and the idea that women should not work and men should be the sole breadwinners. It is definitely wrong for him to prevent his wife from working, but I think the reason he is doing it- to spare her the pain of having to work- is at least a little understandable considering the time period and morals of the society he is in.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment